Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia

Received: 12 July 2024     Accepted: 10 August 2024     Published: 27 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Tef, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter is the main crop grown in Ethiopia. However, its productivity remains low compared to its potential yield. A multi-location trial was conducted to evaluate selected best-performing lines from previous trials in terms of stability and yield coupled with farmers’ opinions and preferences, aiming to identify superior lines. A total of twenty tef genotypes, including a standard and a local check were field evaluated using RCBD with four replications. The lines were grown in 4 m² plots across eight different locations in Ethiopia during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 cropping seasons. Additionally, an on-farm participatory variety evaluation involving 198 participants, comprising farmers and agricultural experts, was conducted during the 2019 cropping season. Phenological and agromorphological traits were collected and subjected to statistical analysis to identify the best genotypes. The pooled analysis of variance revealed significant variation (at the 0.01% level) among genotypes, locations, and years for all traits except grain yield and days to maturity. While some genotypes produced comparable grain yields, none surpassed the standard check variety Negus. Additionally, Participatory variety selection was conducted during the crop maturity stage using the direct-matrix ranking method. Farmers sets their own selection criteria, these are crop stand, tillering capacity, panicle weight, lodging tolerance, culm strength, and pest infestation or infection. Based on their evaluation, the genotypes DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 51, DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 47 and DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 68 were identified as farmers preferred varieties from direct matrix ranking evaluations and chosen for their performance in the field. Thus, this study highlights the feasibility of participatory variety selection in gaining insights into farmer’s perceptions, preferences, strengths and weaknesses of tef genotypes.

Published in Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15
Page(s) 116-121
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Farmers, Genotype, Direct Matrix Ranking, Potential-Environment, PVS, Tef

References
[1] Adugna Wakjira, Gemechu Keneni, Musa Jarso, and Bulcha Woyessa. Opportunities for participatory crop improvement and supporting informal seed supply in Oromia region, Ethiopia. In farmers, seed and varieties: Supporting informal seed supply in Ethiopia, ed. M. H. Thijssen, Zewdie, Bishaw, A., Bashir, and W. S. de Boef. Wageningen: Wageningen International, 2008.
[2] Anadolu Agency. Ethiopia's 'super grain' seeks to capture global market, 2017.
[3] Central Statistics Agency, Agricultural Sample Survey (CSA). Area and Production of Major Crops. (Private peasant holding-Meher Season), 2022, Statistical Bulletin, 593, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4] Joshi A., Witcombe J. R. Farmer Participatory Approaches for Varietal Improvement, 1996, Cambridge Univ. Press 31: 461-477.
[5] Kebebew Assefa, Solomon Chanyalew, and Zerihun Tadele. Tef, Eragrostis tef(Zucc.) Trotter, In: Millets and Sorghum, Biology and Genetic Improvement (J.V. Patil, ed.), 2017, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. UK, pp 226-266.
[6] OJulong H., Letayo E., Sakwera L., Mgonja F., Sheunda P. and Kibuka J. Participatory Variety Selection for enhanced promotion and adoption of improved finger millet varieties: A case for Singida and Iramba Districts in Central Tanzania, 2017, International Africa J. Rural Dev. 2: 77-93.
[7] SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 9.00 editions, 2002, Cary, N. C., SAS Institute Inc.
[8] Seyfu Ketema. Tef (Eragrostis tef): Breeding, Genetic Resources, Agronomy, Utilization and Role in Ethiopian Agriculture, 1993, Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[9] Yifru Teklu and Hailu Tefera. Genetic improvement in grain yield potential and associated agronomic traits of tef (Eragrostis tef, 2005, Euphytica. 141: 247-254.
[10] de Boef, W. S. and J. B. Ogliari. Participatory Crop Improvement and Supporting Informal Seed Supply. In: M. H., Thijssen, Zewdie Bishaw, Abdurahman Beshir and W. S. de Boef, 2008 (eds.). Farmers, seeds and varieties: supporting informal seed supply in Ethiopia, 2008, Wageningen, Wageningen International, pp: 177-185.
[11] Kitch, L. W., Boukar, O., Endondo, C. and Murdock, L. L. Farmer acceptability criteria in breeding cowpea, 1998, Experimental Agriculture 34: 475–486.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fikre, T., Genet, Y., Kebede, W., Tolossa, K., Chanyalew, S., et al. (2024). Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 12(4), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fikre, T.; Genet, Y.; Kebede, W.; Tolossa, K.; Chanyalew, S., et al. Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2024, 12(4), 116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fikre T, Genet Y, Kebede W, Tolossa K, Chanyalew S, et al. Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia. J Plant Sci. 2024;12(4):116-121. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15,
      author = {Tsion Fikre and Yazachew Genet and Worku Kebede and Kidist Tolossa and Solomon Chanyalew and Kebebew Assefa and Atinkut Fentahun and Nigus Belay and Chekole Nigus},
      title = {Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {116-121},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20241204.15},
      abstract = {Tef, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter is the main crop grown in Ethiopia. However, its productivity remains low compared to its potential yield. A multi-location trial was conducted to evaluate selected best-performing lines from previous trials in terms of stability and yield coupled with farmers’ opinions and preferences, aiming to identify superior lines. A total of twenty tef genotypes, including a standard and a local check were field evaluated using RCBD with four replications. The lines were grown in 4 m² plots across eight different locations in Ethiopia during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 cropping seasons. Additionally, an on-farm participatory variety evaluation involving 198 participants, comprising farmers and agricultural experts, was conducted during the 2019 cropping season. Phenological and agromorphological traits were collected and subjected to statistical analysis to identify the best genotypes. The pooled analysis of variance revealed significant variation (at the 0.01% level) among genotypes, locations, and years for all traits except grain yield and days to maturity. While some genotypes produced comparable grain yields, none surpassed the standard check variety Negus. Additionally, Participatory variety selection was conducted during the crop maturity stage using the direct-matrix ranking method. Farmers sets their own selection criteria, these are crop stand, tillering capacity, panicle weight, lodging tolerance, culm strength, and pest infestation or infection. Based on their evaluation, the genotypes DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 51, DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 47 and DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 68 were identified as farmers preferred varieties from direct matrix ranking evaluations and chosen for their performance in the field. Thus, this study highlights the feasibility of participatory variety selection in gaining insights into farmer’s perceptions, preferences, strengths and weaknesses of tef genotypes.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Selection of Genotypes for Enhancing Tef Productivity Through Farmers’ Participation in Potential Environments of Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Tsion Fikre
    AU  - Yazachew Genet
    AU  - Worku Kebede
    AU  - Kidist Tolossa
    AU  - Solomon Chanyalew
    AU  - Kebebew Assefa
    AU  - Atinkut Fentahun
    AU  - Nigus Belay
    AU  - Chekole Nigus
    Y1  - 2024/08/27
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15
    T2  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JF  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    JO  - Journal of Plant Sciences
    SP  - 116
    EP  - 121
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-0731
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20241204.15
    AB  - Tef, Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter is the main crop grown in Ethiopia. However, its productivity remains low compared to its potential yield. A multi-location trial was conducted to evaluate selected best-performing lines from previous trials in terms of stability and yield coupled with farmers’ opinions and preferences, aiming to identify superior lines. A total of twenty tef genotypes, including a standard and a local check were field evaluated using RCBD with four replications. The lines were grown in 4 m² plots across eight different locations in Ethiopia during the 2018/19 and 2019/20 cropping seasons. Additionally, an on-farm participatory variety evaluation involving 198 participants, comprising farmers and agricultural experts, was conducted during the 2019 cropping season. Phenological and agromorphological traits were collected and subjected to statistical analysis to identify the best genotypes. The pooled analysis of variance revealed significant variation (at the 0.01% level) among genotypes, locations, and years for all traits except grain yield and days to maturity. While some genotypes produced comparable grain yields, none surpassed the standard check variety Negus. Additionally, Participatory variety selection was conducted during the crop maturity stage using the direct-matrix ranking method. Farmers sets their own selection criteria, these are crop stand, tillering capacity, panicle weight, lodging tolerance, culm strength, and pest infestation or infection. Based on their evaluation, the genotypes DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 51, DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 47 and DZ-01-974 X GA-10-3 RIL 68 were identified as farmers preferred varieties from direct matrix ranking evaluations and chosen for their performance in the field. Thus, this study highlights the feasibility of participatory variety selection in gaining insights into farmer’s perceptions, preferences, strengths and weaknesses of tef genotypes.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections